EDITOR THINKS
Filipinos should be accustomed to former President Rodrigo Duterte's brash and often inflammatory rhetoric by now. At least, that's what some say. That's just part of his humorous character, the controversial remarks mixed with the strongman persona, encapsulated into a joke. Nevermind the blatant disregard of diplomatic norms and decorum expected of leaders...as long as it's funny. This is how Duterte's supporters want the Filipino people to treat one of his most unsettling comments, one the most jarring after his time in office, when he made a sick joke about wanting to kill senators.
While, on the other hand, his non-supporters cannot just dismiss his words as mere hyperbole or a form of dark humor. The implications of such statements, they think, run far deeper than mere casual banter. It highlights a dangerous disrespect for the sanctity of democratic institutions, the erosion of political civility, and the risk of normalizing violence as a form of political expression.
Context and Background: A Pattern of Provocation
Duterte's presidency was plagued by numerous controversial remarks and actions that often bordered on the absurd. His rhetoric was frequently laced with vulgarities and threats, targeting not just political opponents but anyone who dared question his policies. Whether it was calling for the killing of drug suspects in the war on drugs or belittling journalists, critics, and activists, Duterte's words were often as combative as his actions.
But let us not forget, he is no longer president. The specific remark about killing senators stands out as an affront to the democratic principles upon which the nation is built. The remark, made during one of Duterte's public speeches, was not the first time he expressed disdain for the legislature. He had previously clashed with lawmakers over his policies, particularly over the Senate's role in holding his administration accountable. But suggesting now the execution of senators, even in jest, crosses a line that should never be overlooked. Had anyone else made that comment would have triggered the anti-terror bill and perhaps caused immediate arrest.
The Power of Words and the Responsibility of Leadership
A leader’s words have a profound impact on the public, especially when that leader is in a position of immense power. Presidents and ex-presidents are not ordinary individuals making idle comments; their statements can shape public discourse, influence political outcomes, and, in extreme cases, incite violence or social unrest. In the case of Duterte’s "joke" about killing senators, the language used is not merely a slip of the tongue but a reflection of a broader political culture that undermines the integrity of democratic processes.
By suggesting the killing of senators, Duterte trivialized the role of elected officials and sowed seeds of contempt for the legislative branch. Such remarks normalize the idea that violence is an acceptable solution to political disagreements. Moreover, it sends a message that political opponents, especially those in positions of power, should be silenced by any means necessary. In a democracy, this kind of rhetoric should not be tolerated, as it undermines the principles of debate, negotiation, and compromise that are essential for governance.
The Erosion of Political Civility
At its core, Duterte’s remark was an assault on political civility. The Philippines, like many other democratic nations, is founded on the idea that elected officials, regardless of party affiliation, should be able to engage in constructive dialogue and debate. While it is not uncommon for political figures to clash over policy differences, there is an expectation that these disputes will remain within the boundaries of respectful discourse.
Duterte’s comment about killing senators reflects a broader erosion of civility in politics. It is no longer enough to simply disagree with one’s opponents; now, there seems to be a growing acceptance of extreme and violent rhetoric as a legitimate form of political expression. This shift has far-reaching consequences. When politicians resort to language that promotes violence, they contribute to a culture of fear and intimidation. They set an example for the public, especially young people, that aggression is a viable path to resolving conflict. The result is a toxic political environment where reasoned debate is drowned out by threats and insults.
The Dangerous Precedent of Normalizing Violence
Perhaps the most troubling aspect of Duterte’s joke is the dangerous precedent it sets for political discourse in the Philippines. Duterte’s tenure witnessed the normalization of rhetoric that promoted violence, not just as a metaphor but as a legitimate political strategy. From calling for the extrajudicial killings of drug users to encouraging vigilantism, the former president's words often seemed designed to embolden those willing to take the law into their own hands.
In a country where political violence has a long and tragic history, such statements are particularly dangerous. The Philippines has seen numerous instances of political violence, including the assassination of politicians, journalists, and activists. Duterte’s rhetoric runs the risk of exacerbating these issues, further polarizing society and increasing the likelihood of violent confrontations. When a former president jokes about killing lawmakers, it emboldens those who are already predisposed to violence. It sends the message that violence is not only permissible but also humorous.
The Senate, as one of the country’s key institutions, plays an essential role in holding the executive accountable, crafting legislation, and representing the interests of the people. By mocking the idea of senators as individuals worthy of life and respect, Duterte diminished the value of democratic checks and balances. It erodes trust in institutions that are meant to serve as safeguards against tyranny.
The Role of Accountability in Democratic Governance
Democracies thrive on accountability. Elected officials, including presidents, are expected to be held accountable for their actions, particularly when those actions may harm the public interest. The legislative branch, including the Senate, plays a vital role in this process. Through oversight, investigation, and public discourse, the Senate helps ensure that the executive branch operates within the law and does not overstep its bounds.
Duterte’s joke about killing senators represents a rejection of accountability. It is an attempt to silence critics and neutralize opposition. Such behavior undermines the very essence of democratic governance, which relies on robust institutions, the rule of law, and checks and balances. When a leader makes light of violence against political opponents, it sends a clear message that accountability is not a priority and that dissent will not be tolerated. This creates a chilling effect where politicians and citizens alike are afraid to speak out against abuses of power.
The Broader Impact on Society
While Duterte’s remarks may have been directed at senators, the broader societal implications are impossible to ignore. In a climate where leaders make jokes about violence, ordinary citizens are more likely to internalize these attitudes. If a former president openly mocks the killing of political figures, it becomes easier for others to justify the use of violence in their own disputes.
Moreover, this rhetoric feeds into a larger societal trend of disrespect for human life. In a country like the Philippines, where poverty, inequality, and political corruption remain persistent issues, it is easy for vulnerable groups to become victims of violence. Duterte’s words, regardless of intent, reinforce the idea that certain individuals are expendable—be it the poor, the disenfranchised, or even political adversaries.
A Call for Responsible Leadership
As citizens, we must demand more from our leaders. Political leadership is not simply about wielding power but about using that power responsibly. A responsible leader must inspire unity, uphold democratic principles, and engage in constructive dialogue. While humor can be a tool for bringing people together, it must never be used to incite division or violence. Jokes about killing senators or any other form of violence should be condemned, not dismissed as mere exaggeration or offhand comments.
Duterte’s remark about killing senators is a stark reminder of the dangers of unchecked speech. It highlights the need for responsible leadership that respects democratic institutions, values civility, and prioritizes the well-being of the nation. As the Philippines moves forward, it is essential that the next generation of leaders learns from the mistakes of the past and works to rebuild the political culture with integrity, respect, and a commitment to peace.
